Messages in this thread |  | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM | | Date | 22 Jan 2001 15:35:14 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <3A6CB49E.75B8937D@conectiva.com.br> By author: Andrew Clausen <clausen@conectiva.com.br> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > Apart from > > that, the kernel couldn't care. You could set all your Ext2 partitions > > as ID 82, your swap as ID 83 and Linux would carry on as if nothing had > > changed. > > Exactly. So, for new disk labels, or whatever, we should recommend to > the relevant hackers that we have exactly one number for Linux. Or > what? >
We have:
0x82 - Linux swap 0x83 - Linux filesystem 0x85 - Linux extended partition (yes, this one does matter!)
0x81 isn't Linux, but rather a Minix partition ID.
There seems to be some value in having a different value for swap. It lets an automatic program find a partition that does not contain data.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |