Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 21 Jan 2001 11:49:52 -0600 (CST) | From | Jesse Pollard <> | Subject | Re: multi-queue scheduler update |
| |
Mark Hahn <hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>: > > > > microseconds/yield > > > # threads 2.2.16-22 2.4 2.4-multi-queue > > > ------------ --------- -------- --------------- > > > 16 18.740 4.603 1.455 > > > > I remeber the O(1) scheduler from Davide Libenzi was beating the mainline O(N) > > isn't the normal case (as in "The Right Case to optimize") > where there are close to zero runnable tasks? what realistic/sane > scenarios have very large numbers of spinning threads? all server > situations I can think of do not. not volanomark -loopback, surely!
How about massively parallel compute jobs when synchronizing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesse I Pollard, II Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil
Any opinions expressed are solely my own. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |