[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] generic IO write clustering

On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote:


> I think there is a big disadvantage of this appropeach:
> To find out which pages are clusterable, we need do do bmap/get_block,
> that means we have to go through the block-allocation functions, which
> is rather expensive, and then we have to do it again in writepage, for
> the pages that are actually clustered bt the VM.

In case the metadata was not already cached before ->cluster() (in this
case there is no disk IO at all), ->cluster() will cache it avoiding
further disk accesses by writepage (or writepages()).

> Another thing I dislike is that the flushing gets more complicated with
> yout VM-level clustering. Now (and with my appropeach I'll describe
> below) flushing is write it out now and do whatever you else want,
> with you design it is 'find out pages beside this page in write out
> a bunch of them' - much more complicated. I'd like it abstracted out.

I dont see your point here. What I'm missing?

> > The idea is to work with delayed allocated pages, too. A filesystem which
> > has this feature can, at its "cluster" operation, allocate delayed pages
> > contiguously on disk, and then return to the VM code which now can
> > potentially write a bunch of dirty pages in a few big IO operations.
> That does also work nicely together with ->writepage level IO clustering.
> > I'm sure that a bit of tuning to know the optimal cluster size will be
> > needed. Also some fs locking problems will appear.
> Sure, but again that's an issue for every kind of IO clustering...
> No my proposal. I prefer doing it in writepage, as stated above.
> Writepage loops over the MAX_CLUSTERED_PAGES/2 dirty pages before and
> behind the initial page, it first uses test wether the page should be
> clustered (a callback from vm, highly 'balanceable'...), then does
> a bmap/get_block to check wether it is contingous.
> Finally the IO is submitted using a submit_bh loop, or when using a
> kiobuf-based IO path all clustered pages are passed down to ll_rw_kio
> in one piece.
> As you see the easy integration with the new bulk-IO mechanisms is also
> an advantage of this proposal, without the need a new multi-page a_op.

IMHO replicating the code is the worst thing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [W:0.073 / U:1.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site