[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system time (was: Linux 2.2.19pre3)
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> If you have a tsc on your chip - I think most modern laptops will do as they
> tend to be pentium/mmx k6 or pII/pIII processors, then you can check the
> elapsed CPU cycles and recover the jiffies from that. Might be an interesting
> exercise for someone

This had been a report for a non-portable computer which should (Duron)
indeed have a TSC, that is, /proc/cpuinfo lists one ;-) Do 486s
generally have APM so it might be worth fixing/working around for them?

If so, would re-reading from CMOS for boxes without TSC be a "valid"

Matthias Andree
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.123 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site