[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Is sendfile all that sexy?
> > And no, I don't actually hink that sendfile() is all that hot. It was
> > _very_ easy to implement, and can be considered a 5-minute hack to give
> > a feature that fit very well in the MM architecture, and that the Apache
> > folks had already been using on other architectures.
> The current sendfile() has the limitation that it can't read data from
> a socket. Would it be another 5-minute hack to remove this limitation, so
> you could sendfile between sockets? Now _that_ would be sexy :)

I had patch to do that. (Unoptimized, of course)

Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.164 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site