Messages in this thread |  | | From | Russell King <> | | Subject | Re: console spin_lock | | Date | Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:50:15 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
Andrew Morton writes: > The subtler problem will be interrupt-capable drivers which > do a bare spin_lock() to serialise wrt their interrupt routines, > relying upon interrupts being disabled. They'll be deadlocky > and will need changing. That's trivial to find and fix though.
Uhh, what if you have this situation:
interrupt (level triggered) enter interrupt handler printk (can re-enable interrupts?) enter interrupt handler printk (can re-enable interrupts?) enter interrupt handler printk (can re-enable interrupts?) ....
So surely this isn't a new problem? _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |