Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:57:20 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] |
| |
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > { > > int val = 1; > > setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK, > > (char *)&val,sizeof(val)); > > val = 0; > > setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK, > > (char *)&val,sizeof(val)); > > } > > > > differ from what you posted. It does the same in my opinion. Maybe we are > > not talking about the same thing? > > The above is equivalent to SIOCPUSH _only_ if the caller wasn't using either > TCP_NODELAY or TCP_CORK.
why? I can restore whatever state i want, the above is just a mechanizm to force the push.
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |