[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Is sendfile all that sexy?

> device-to-device is not the same as disk-to-disk. A better example would
> be a streaming file server. Slowly the pci bus becomes a bottleneck, why
> would you want to move the data twice over the pci bus if once is enough
> and the data very likely not needed afterwards? Sure you can use a more
> expensive 64bit/60MHz bus, but why should you if the 32bit/30MHz bus is
> theoretically fast enough for your application?

theoretically fast enough for the application would imply the dual
transfers across the bus would fit :)

also, if a system was doing something with that much throughput, i
suspect it would not only be designed with 64/66 busses (or better), but
also have things on several different busses. that makes device to
device life more of a challenge.

rick jones

these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to email, OR post, but please do NOT do BOTH...
my email address is raj in the domain...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.109 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site