Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:41:16 +0100 | | From | Pavel Machek <> | | Subject | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? |
| |
Hi!
> > > TWO observations: > > > - Given Linux's non-pre-emptability of the kernel i get the feeling that > > > sendfile could starve other user space programs. Imagine trying to send a > > > 1Gig file on 10Mbps pipe in one shot. > > > > Hehe, try sigkilling process doing that transfer. Last time I tried it > > it did not work. > > >From Alexey's response: it does get descheduled possibly every sndbuf > send. So you should be able to sneak that sigkill.
Did you actually tried it? Last time I did the test, SIGKILL did not make it in. sendfile did not actually check for signals...
(And you could do something like send 100MB from cache into dev null. I do not see where sigkill could sneak in in this case.) Pavel -- The best software in life is free (not shareware)! Pavel GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |