[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

[Peter Samuelson]
> > What if you copy both 'filename' and 'filename:ext' onto the same
> > fs? Do they get combined into one file?

[Michael Rothwell]
> ON Ext2, you get two files. On NTFS, you get one file, and a stream
> on that file.

Yeah. I think that's broken. It gets worse when you start doing other
posixy things. Say you do 'mv foo bar:baz' on an ntfs partition.
Those strong in the force will recall that rename() is supposed to
atomically unlink 'bar:baz'. Instead you seem to be asking it to add
an extra stream to 'bar'. So should we still unlink the old 'bar'?
And then what if 'foo' is a multi-stream file? Where do the extra
streams go? Or do you just get a big fat -EINVAL for every special

I think ultimately there is no posixy (or least-surprise) way to deal
with such things. If we truly need forks, we need a new api to
manipulate them. Cleverness with ':' or '/' only takes you so far.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.131 / U:3.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site