Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Linus Torvalds) | | Subject | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? | | Date | 15 Jan 2001 13:00:41 -0800 |
| |
In article <200101152033.f0FKXpv250839@saturn.cs.uml.edu>, Albert D. Cahalan <acahalan@cs.uml.edu> wrote: >Ingo Molnar writes: >> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Jonathan Thackray wrote: > >>> It's a very useful system call and makes file serving much more >>> scalable, and I'm glad that most Un*xes now have support for it >>> (Linux, FreeBSD, HP-UX, AIX, Tru64). The next cool feature to add to >>> Linux is sendpath(), which does the open() before the sendfile() all >>> combined into one system call. > >Ingo Molnar's data in a nice table: > >open/close 7.5756 microseconds >stat 5.4864 microseconds >write 0.9614 microseconds >read 1.1420 microseconds >syscall 0.6349 microseconds > >Rather than combining open() with sendfile(), it could be combined >with stat().
Note that "fstat()" is fairly low-overhead (unlike "stat()" it obviously doesn't have to parse the name again), so "open+fstat" is quite fine as-is.
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |