Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:36:07 +0200 | | From | Matti Aarnio <> | | Subject | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? |
| |
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:24:55PM +0000, Jonathan Thackray wrote: > It's a very useful system call and makes file serving much more > scalable, and I'm glad that most Un*xes now have support for it > (Linux, FreeBSD, HP-UX, AIX, Tru64). The next cool feature to add to > Linux is sendpath(), which does the open() before the sendfile() > all combined into one system call.
One thing about 'sendfile' (and likely 'sendpath') is that current (hammered into running binaries -> unchangeable) syscalls support only up to 2GB files at 32 bit systems.
Glibc 2.2(9) at RedHat <sys/sendfile.h>:
#ifdef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 # error "<sendfile.h> cannot be used with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" #endif
I do admit that doing sendfile() on some extremely large file is unlikely, but still...
> Ugh, I hear you all scream :-) > Jon. > -- > Jonathan Thackray Zeus House, Cowley Road, Cambridge CB4 OZT, UK > Zeus Technology http://www.zeus.com/
/Matti Aarnio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |