Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:45:57 -0800 | From | J Sloan <> | Subject | Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? |
| |
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Of course, you may be right on wuftpd. It obviously wasn't designed with > security in mind, other alternatives may be better.
I run proftpd on all my ftp servers - it's fast, configurable and can do all the tricks I need - even red hat seems to agree that proftpd is the way to go.
Visit any red hat ftp site and they are running proftpd -
So, why do they keep shipping us wu-ftpd instead?
That really frosts me.
jjs
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |