Messages in this thread | | | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Date | Sun, 14 Jan 2001 02:55:28 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 |
| |
Andi Kleen writes: > In my opinion (rt)netlink would benefit a lot from introducing 5-10 > new errnos and possibly a new socket option to get a string/number > with the exact error.
Introducing 5-10 new errnos just for rtnetlink is a big waste when we already have socket extended errors which are perfect for this purpose.
Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |