Messages in this thread |  | | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Date | Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:17:54 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 |
| |
Igmar Palsenberg writes:
> we might want to consider changing the error the call gives in case > MULTIPLE_TABLES isn't set. -EINVAL is ugly, -ENOSYS should make the error > more clear..
How do I tell the difference between using the wrong system call number to invoke an ioctl or socket option change, and making a call for a feature I haven't configured into my kernel?
I think ENOSYS is just a bad a choice.
Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |