Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 13 Jan 2001 05:46:29 -0800 (PST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: khttpd beats boa with persistent patch |
| |
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
> anyhow a real network benchmark might show that kHTTPd latency is actually > not as broken as this one indicates. i'd however really hesitate to call > this a win.
Well as Arjan says: khttpd starves userspace and that might cause the latency. I dont have the ability to really test it over a 100mbs link.
> btw is your CPU slow or something? 'cause istr getting numbers at least > this good from apache across localhost several years ago even under > 2.0.x... and boa and khttpd should both beat apache in this.
Its a Cyrix 150. So yes.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |