Messages in this thread |  | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: khttpd beaten by boa | Date | 12 Jan 2001 02:03:32 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <14942.48157.259491.78067@pizda.ninka.net> By author: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Lars Marowsky-Bree writes: > > This just goes on to show that khttpd is unnecessary kernel bloat > > and can be "just as well" handled by a userspace application, minus > > some rather very special cases which do not justify its inclusion > > into the main kernel. > > My take on this is that khttpd is unmaintained garbage. > > TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and > beat the pants off of anything done in userspace. >
Then why don't we unload khttpd and put in Tux?
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |