[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: khttpd beaten by boa
Followup to:  <>
By author: "David S. Miller" <>
In newsgroup:
> Lars Marowsky-Bree writes:
> > This just goes on to show that khttpd is unnecessary kernel bloat
> > and can be "just as well" handled by a userspace application, minus
> > some rather very special cases which do not justify its inclusion
> > into the main kernel.
> My take on this is that khttpd is unmaintained garbage.
> TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and
> beat the pants off of anything done in userspace.

Then why don't we unload khttpd and put in Tux?

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.097 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site