lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Subtle MM bug
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:56:57AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:

> > The MMU on these systems is a CAM, and the mmu table is thus backwards to
> > convention. (It also means you can notionally map two physical addresses to
> > one virtual but thats undefined in the implementation ;))
>
> Are there any other (not yet supported) platforms with similar (or other
> unrelated, but hard to support because of the current architecture of
> the kernel) problems?
>
> (No, I have no secret trumps up my sleeve, I'm just curious.)

Having a reverse mappings is the least sucky way to handle virtual aliases
of certain types of MIPS caches.

Ralf

--
"Embrace, Enhance, Eliminate" - it worked for the pope, it'll work for Bill.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.218 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site