[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1
> > Please tell me what you think the right interface is that provides a hook
> > on io completion and is asynchronous.
> Suggested fix to kiovec's: get rid of them. Immediately. Replace them with
> kiobuf's that can handle scatter-gather pages. kiobuf's have 90% of that
> support already.
> Never EVER have a "struct page **" interface. It is never the valid thing
> to do.

Hmm, /me is quite happy with it. It's fine for *big* chunks of memory like
video frames: I just need a large number of pages, length and offset. If
someone wants to have a look: a rewritten bttv version which uses kiobufs
is available at

It does _not_ use kiovecs throuth (to be exact: kiovecs with just one single
kiobuf in there).

> You should have
> struct fragment {
> struct page *page;
> __u16 offset, length;
> }

What happens with big memory blocks? Do all pages but the first and last
get offset=0 and length=PAGE_SIZE then?


Get back there in front of the computer NOW. Christmas can wait.
-- Linus "the Grinch" Torvalds, 24 Dec 2000 on linux-kernel
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.382 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site