[lkml]   [2001]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: The latest instance in the A20 farce
"Dunlap, Randy" wrote:
> I'm not sure about this, but I'm wondering if the
> Fixed (as in Static) ACPI Description Table (FADT)
> can indicate that the platform is a legacy-free system.

Parsing ACPI is a nightmare on steroids. That is just Not An Option[TM]
in a < 10K bootstrap routine.

> > Worse, they define that port 92h, bit 1, is no longer
> > A20M#... but they
> > don't forbid the system from using it for other things.
> I don't quite see it that way. Where do you see that?
> Maybe it just needs to be more explicit.

It probably was *intended*, but it isn't *specified*, and in fact some
manufacturers have been known to abuse this bit.

> Ch. 3 (SYS-0047) says that port 92h:bit 1 doesn't toggle/affect A20M#.
> Appendix A says that port 92h is (still?) "System Control Port A"
> (not defined here AFAIK).
> (I haven't checked all of the other chapters/appendices.)

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.058 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site