Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 10 Jan 2001 22:06:27 +0100 (CET) | From | <> | Subject | Re: unexplained high load |
| |
detected this in kernel log :
Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request in mna handler<1> at virtual address f7d93ef869a1610c Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: current->mm->context = 0000000000000639 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: current->mm->pgd = fffff8000c0d2000 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: \|/ ____ \|/ Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: "@'/ .. \`@" Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: /_| \__/ |_\ Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: \__U_/ Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: proftpd(27129): Oops Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: TSTATE: 0000000080009602 TPC: 000000000044f8ac TNPC: 000000000044f8b0 Y: 00000000 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: g0: 0000000000000000 g1: 0000000000000001 g2: 0000000000c34000 g3: ffffffffffffe000 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: g4: fffff80000000000 g5: 0000000000000000 g6: fffff8000d8b8000 g7: 0000000000000001 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: o0: f7d93ef869a16104 o1: 0000000000000104 o2: 0000000000358d60 o3: fffff80000334000 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: o4: fffff8001fe00000 o5: fffff8001fe77c68 sp: fffff8000d8bb491 ret_pc: 000000000044f828 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: l0: fffff8000068cd60 l1: 0000000000000346 l2: fffff80019d2e600 l3: 0000000000000000 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: l4: fffff800156bc000 l5: 0000000000c34000 l6: fffff8000068cde0 l7: 000000000000026e Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: i0: 000000000000026e i1: 0000000070228286 i2: 0000000000000346 i3: 0000000000605c00 Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: i4: fffff8001fc8b9e0 i5: 0000000000605c00 i6: fffff8000d8bb561 i7: 000000000049b7ec Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: Caller[000000000049b7ec] Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: Caller[000000000045954c] Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: Caller[0000000000410114] Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: Caller[0000000000022bb0] Jan 10 00:34:15 ddx kernel: Instruction DUMP: d05ca0e0 02c20003 d072c00a <e0722008> e074a0e0 d05f6100 90022001 d0776100 d25b40
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 kernel@ddx.a2000.nu wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Hacksaw wrote: > > > > Could someone maybe explain this ? > > > (top output, but same load is given with 'uptime') > > > there is no cpu or disk activity > > > kernel is 2.2.18pre9 on sun ultra10-300 (ultrasparc IIi) > > > > > > 9:25pm up 112 days, 1:52, 1 user, load average: 1.24, 1.05, 1.02 > > > 91 processes: 90 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped > > > CPU states: 2.5% user, 2.3% system, 0.0% nice, 95.1% idle > > > Mem: 515144K av, 506752K used, 8392K free, 73464K shrd, 58472K buff > > > Swap: 131528K av, 15968K used, 115560K free 358904K cached > > > > You have no processes??? My gosh, that is a problem. :-) > 91 processes, only 1 running (think top) > > > > > The load average is how many processes are runnable, therefore you have > > runnable processes. > > > > If you have Netscape or Mozilla running on your box, it may be in a > > permanently runnable state. > it's a firewall/gateway/mail box, so no X or netscape > > > Another amusing possibility is that you have a hacked box, and top is > > reporting the stupid IRC bot that is running, but not showing you the actuall > > process, because it too is hacked. > don't think > w,uptime,top give the same value > > > > > Replace ps and top, and have a look. Don't believe ls, either. > > > > If none of these things are true, you might have another problem. > think this, but problem, machine is running ok > no slow response, only load 1.00 (it's not getting lower) > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |