lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Compiler warnings
Date
I just found out that gcc-2.96 won't compile glibc-2.1.93 or glibc-2.1.2 or
glibc-2.1.3 successfully whereas gcc-2.95.2 will. It bombs in a couple of
places.
I just downgraded my machine to 2.95.2 to prove the point. Guess I'll wait
for gcc-3.0.

________________________________________
Michael D. Black Principal Engineer
mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203
http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations
http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page
FAX 321-676-2355
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamie Lokier" <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: <davidge@jazzfree.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Compiler warnings


David Woodhouse wrote:
> You cannot safely compile even 2.4 kernels with gcc-2.96 on any platform,
as
> far as I'm aware. It's an insane thing to do. Use a sensible compiler.

Oh. I've been using gcc-2.96 with test7 for a while, no problems except
the ## warnings. Never occured to me that gcc-2.95.2 would be better,
which I was using for ages before that...

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.056 / U:33.976 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site