Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Mike Black" <> | Subject | Re: Compiler warnings | Date | Thu, 7 Sep 2000 11:16:29 -0400 |
| |
I just found out that gcc-2.96 won't compile glibc-2.1.93 or glibc-2.1.2 or glibc-2.1.3 successfully whereas gcc-2.95.2 will. It bombs in a couple of places. I just downgraded my machine to 2.95.2 to prove the point. Guess I'll wait for gcc-3.0.
________________________________________ Michael D. Black Principal Engineer mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203 http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page FAX 321-676-2355 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jamie Lokier" <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk> To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: <davidge@jazzfree.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 10:55 AM Subject: Re: Compiler warnings
David Woodhouse wrote: > You cannot safely compile even 2.4 kernels with gcc-2.96 on any platform, as > far as I'm aware. It's an insane thing to do. Use a sensible compiler.
Oh. I've been using gcc-2.96 with test7 for a while, no problems except the ## warnings. Never occured to me that gcc-2.95.2 would be better, which I was using for ages before that...
-- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |