lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: modules_install?
From
Date
>>>>> "keith" == Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> writes:

Hi

keith> Agreed, and the kbuild team is already looking at a complete Makefile
keith> redesign for kernel 2.5. The latest makefile wishlist is in
keith> ftp://ftp.ocs.com.au/pub/makefile-wishlist-2.5-3.gz, all sensible
keith> comments appreciated.

once there, in:

(MEC-4) Standardize the post-vmlinux targets.

Actually I think Keith subsumes this with "make an installable
system". I'd like all the elements of this system to go into
documented places with standardized architecture-independent
names. In D.M., the vmlinux file and bzImage file and System.map
go into a target directory named "boot/".


Could we make it _easy_ to put all the
modules/System.map/bzImage/<whatever> in boot/ and make it easy to do
a tar of that directory and make easy to install that dir in another
machine (perhaps puting a tiny Makefile/script there to do that).

Just my 2 pesetas :))

Later, Juan.


--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.054 / U:6.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site