[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Is it OK to release non-GPL network driver with source?
In article <>,
Dave Allen <> wrote:
>My company is currently working on a linux network driver (I'm sorry,
>but I can't disclose which company or the nature of the driver right
>now). However, recent discussions on this list have made me grow
>concerned about licensing problems with the GPL.
>The source code for the driver _is_ going to be available, but it will
>not be GPL'd.

Note that whenever it's not GPL'd, all the module restrictions kick in.
So it's going to be "legal" the same way any binary only module is
"legal" - assuming all the nasty requirements are met. For something as
simple (from a conceptual standpoint, not necessarily an implementation
standpoint) as a network driver, doing that is not likely to be a big

It obviously cannot be linked into the kernel, but as a loadable module
it's ok as long as it uses the standard interfaces and nothing more.

And sure, having source available might make it easier for people to
help you: it can't become part of the standard kernel, and as such it
will never be supported, but that's true of binary-only modules too.

I wouldn't recommend it, but I don't see that it would be an
insurmountable problem.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.058 / U:2.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site