lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
> Yeah.  Long transition, plus user education (which never works, dontcha
> know), plus probably a helper tool akin to checkconfig.

I think it would help to have a well documented "module writers kit".
(Maybe there is one and I'm not aware of it).

mec> I'm all in favor of 'if ( CONFIG_BAR )', but I think it will have to
mec> be 'if ( CONFIG_BAR - 0 )' if you want to use them any time soon.

peter> Am I being obtuse? What is the functional difference?

Doh, I am thinking in the wrong language again!

"CONFIG_BAR - 0" works when $CONFIG_BAR might expand to either "" or "1".
But that's not what happens in 2.4.0 and it's not what happens under Al
Viro's proposal.

Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.025 / U:2.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site