[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was
    Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > >Well, now GCC does CSE across "asm" and will eliminate memory loads,
    > What is "CSE"?

    Common Subexpression Elimination.

    If the compiler sees an expression equivalent to one it evaluated
    earlier, there is no need to evaluate it a second time.

    So "a = x+x; b = x+x" will evaluate "x+x" just once and store it twice.

    This applies to memory reads too. If you read from memory once, and
    read it again later, the later read can be eliminated. You have the
    right value in a register already.

    Memory CSE depends on proving that no intermediate operation clobbers
    the data at that address. That is why "memory" clobbers are important.
    They indicate that the data at that address _may_ have been clobbered,
    so it must be read again after the clobbering operation.

    Sometimes, after you've forced the second read, you can eliminate the
    first one :-) That's why "memory" appears to just move the read in our
    test case. It's really forcing a read after the "asm", which in turn
    allows the read before the "asm" to be eliminated.

    In more complicated cases, where the result of the first read is
    actually used before the "asm", the "memory" clobber causes the second
    read to occur as well as the first.

    -- Jamie
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.022 / U:49.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site