[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[the end?] RE: Availability of kdb
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Mike Jagdis wrote:

> > Q: Then why isn't kdb in the kernel?
> > A: Uh...
> More to the point, why don't the people that want a kernel
> debugger maintain kdb and simply drop in the patch when they
> need it? If Jeff releases his debugger will anyone care enough
> to maintain it? Less talk, more action methinks :-).

Hmm.. my name is on the to line, so I guess that this is directed
at me too?

I have _no problem_ with Linus not liking/integrating KDB. I only
suggested that it _could_ improve bug report quality and encourage
folks to try to solve problems if it were integrated. I also pointed
out that debuggers are readily available for those who want them.

Now (having gotten the last word in) let's stop talking about something
that's _not going to happen_ and chase down bugs so 2.4 _can_ happen :)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.235 / U:3.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site