lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Availability of kdb


On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > And quite frankly, for most of the real problems (as opposed to the stupid
> > bugs - of which there are many, as the latest crap with "truncate()" has
> > shown us) a debugger doesn't much help. And the real problems are what I
> > worry about. The rest is just details. It will get fixed eventually.
>
> Yes, no doubt you agree that stepping through the code with a source
> level debugger even once would have caught this one:

No I definitely do not agree.

In fact, I would never have seen that problem with _any_ debugger. It
simply would not have happened for me.

And guess what? I saw the bug without any debugger within minutes of
having been told what the problem was. A debugger would not have helped.

And that is the case in 99% of all cases. In most cases the people who see
the problem aren't the same people who can debug them. Giving such a
person a debugger doesn't help.

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.041 / U:1.952 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site