Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 06 Sep 2000 01:58:24 -0700 | From | David Ford <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] devfs support for LVM |
| |
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > + lvm_devfs_handle = devfs_register( > > > + 0 , "lvm", 0, 0, LVM_CHAR_MAJOR, > > > > Does this really have to go into /dev rather than a subdirectory? > > Yes. The userlevel tool can't handle other things without recompiling. > I can't use /dev/lvm, too because this is the name of the control file > without lvm (and the lvm tools will barf if this is a dircetory.
How about making a proper tree and use devfsd to make the backwards compatible symlinks.
-d
-- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'."
begin:vcard n:Ford;David x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg"> adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:david@kalifornia.com title:Blue Labs Developer x-mozilla-cpt:;-12480 fn:David Ford end:vcard
|  |