Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 05 Sep 2000 05:09:10 -0600 | From | "Jeff V. Merkey" <> | Subject | Re: zero-copy TCP |
| |
The origin of this comment was related to a comparison of the MSM/TSM/CSM layer in NetWare and Linux. I've already said that Alan's code handles fast paths well and from what I've seen is comparable to NetWare. The areas I saw where sideband cases and issues of fragment re-assembly. It's as good as what's in NetWare.
Jeff
Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > Alright Ingo, you asked for it. I am going through it now and going > > over ALL my notes. I will catalog ALL of them and post it. Is this > > what you really want? > > yes, this would be the best indeed, to get those places fixed. But if you > dont want to spend your time on that then it's enough to just post a > single incident of such inefficiency and list-walking that impacts latency > like you claim. > > Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |