[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: zero-copy TCP
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:46:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

You are perfectly at liberty to send invalidly checksummed
packets. Its a design decision. The remote simply discards the

Not only that -- from outside the box it's often impossible to tell
why a certain packet has a broken checksum; it might be software,
hardware a stray event or interference for the Redmond Mind Control

Right now; bad checksums occur on most networks[1] fairly often
anyhow; I guess Ingo was trying to say that we should make efforts
not to increase this number if at all possible?


[1] Well, reasonable sized networks. I guess it goes O(n) with the
number of hosts in the absence of something really broken.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.090 / U:2.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site