[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] string-486.h modified
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Petko Manolov wrote:
> > I don't see the point of string-486.c - string-486.h is a replacement
> > of string.h for i[45]86 machines so let stay in include directory.
> The point is it may run faster due to better i-cache usage. Remember
> also that 486 machines don't have much memory, so the gain from reducing
> kernel size is more significant. (Less paging etc.)


> You'd still want string-486.h to _call_ the larger routines in
> string-486.c, using FASTCALL or your choice of alternate registers.

I am not very sure if Linus will like the idea.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:2.006 / U:0.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site