Messages in this thread |  | | From | Chris Mason <> | Date | Mon, 04 Sep 2000 16:39:11 GMT |
| |
On 9/3/00, 3:20:01 AM, Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote regarding Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?:
> On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Not at all. In fact, I'd prefer it that way, because this same thing is > > obviously going to be useful for any other block filesystem with the same > > issue.
[ fs list of truncate fun ]
Thanks, it should be useable on reiserfs, and I'm neck deep in reiserfs_truncate right now anyway. The packed files don't care about this at all, they get read into a zero'd page for readpage, or unpacked for writing. The unpacked tails will need a similar change to the one in ext2.
> <evil grin> > I wonder how much of the crap fixed lately would be caught by > Reiserfs Mighty Benchmark Suite(tm) (main testing tool, according to > Hans). Could somebody take it and run on ext2 from, say it, 2.4.0-test1? > Might be interesting...
;-)
test1 had rare file data corruption, test2 was not at all pretty. The tools aren't there to test VFS, or even the correctness of a given file op (those tests are done by hand when we make changes). There are two common mistakes that we (reiserfs coders) make: missing a brelse, and not dealing properly with a schedule. The load scripts are very good at finding those.
-chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |