Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Mon, 4 Sep 2000 22:55:32 +0200 | From | Rasmus Andersen <> | Subject | [patch] Updated hfs to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface |
| |
Hi.
I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts hfs as per the following patch.
diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/hfs/file.c linux/fs/hfs/file.c --- linux-240test8-pre2/fs/hfs/file.c Sun Feb 27 05:33:42 2000 +++ linux/fs/hfs/file.c Mon Sep 4 20:43:20 2000 @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ written += c; buf += c; mark_buffer_uptodate(bh, 1); - mark_buffer_dirty(bh, 0); + mark_buffer_dirty(bh); brelse(bh); } if (written > 0) { diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/include/linux/hfs_sysdep.h linux/include/linux/hfs_sysdep.h --- linux-240test8-pre2/include/linux/hfs_sysdep.h Mon Jul 31 21:05:03 2000 +++ linux/include/linux/hfs_sysdep.h Mon Sep 4 21:21:12 2000 @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ } extern inline void hfs_buffer_dirty(hfs_buffer buffer) { - mark_buffer_dirty(buffer, 1); + mark_buffer_dirty(buffer); } extern inline void hfs_buffer_sync(hfs_buffer buffer) { -- Regards, Rasmus(rasmus@jaquet.dk)
Without censorship, things can get terribly confused in the public mind. -General William Westmoreland, during the war in Viet Nam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |