Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Sep 2000 20:16:40 -0600 | From | yodaiken@fsmlabs ... | Subject | Re: thread group comments |
| |
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:12:40AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 06:11:05PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de> writes: > > > > > Do you think the SA_NOCLDWAIT/queued exit signal approach makes sense ? > > > > I'm not sure whether it's worth the effort. But I'm saying this now > > looking at the code for another implementation following the 1:1 model. > > So you have a different way to implement pthread_create without context > switch to the thread manager in 2.4 ?
What is the problem with the often proposed CLONE_PARENT solution?
-- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |