lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Should O_NONBLOCK be copied from listening socket to accepting
Date
From
> Well, in our own manpages
>
> man 7 socket
>
> It is possible to do non-blocking IO on sockets by setting
> the O_NONBLOCK flag on a socket file descriptor using
> fcntl(2). O_NONBLOCK is inherited through an accept.

So the man page is wrong ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.036 / U:4.788 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site