lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11
Date
From
> Does anyone actually want /proc/locks to stay?  The data structure

I'd like a way to view the locks that exist - its useful for debugging
weird app stuff

> out /proc/locks. If it could be deleted, a lot of code and data pointers
> could go away. I don't think any program depends on its existance and
> it's a pretty ugly file anyway (exposing kernel pointers to userspace?
> looks like pure debug code).
>
> Speak now, or it shall be gone.

If it makes the code far cleaner then I have no objection. If we can do a
simple (different format even) /proc/locks to replace it that scores double
points ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.048 / U:6.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site