Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 30 Sep 2000 17:41:30 +0200 | From | Marc Lehmann <> | Subject | Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? |
| |
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 04:26:38PM +0100, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial > > compiler, with all the consequences I said. > > And didnt you write something called pgcc once.
Oh yes, of course while providing full binary compatibility. You can even mix & match objects from gcc and pgcc and agcc, no kidding. No distribution that used pgcc was ever binary incompatible to any other distribution, which is the point you keep ignoring.
> *PLONK*
No need to get personal ;) I had hoped you could keep to *technical* reasoning, though :(
-- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |