[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: What is up with Redhat 7.0?
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 04:26:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > They released a supported ex-Cygnus people approved compiler.
> >
> > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial
> > compiler, with all the consequences I said.
> And didnt you write something called pgcc once.

pgcc never was incompatible at binary level to gcc/egcs.


It's really absurd to attack Lehmann but I understand that's
your job.

RedHat workers should accept that they working for a company
that works against the community. This does not mean that
each individual worker works against the community but this
fact is not really important.
That's simply a fact that you can't discuss away by attacking Lehmann
who is one of the main integration persons (gcc/egcs).

Please read


ciao -

" A standard that defines "bc" but not "dc" is broken by design - SUS "

Stefan Traby Linux/ia32 fax: +43-3133-6107-9
Mitterlasznitzstr. 13 Linux/alpha phone: +43-3133-6107-2
8302 Nestelbach Linux/sparc
Austria mailto://
Europe mailto://
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.161 / U:8.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site