[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Bottom Handles/soft irqs/timer interrupts/SMP .....
>>>>> "anton" == Anton Blanchard <> writes:

>> > 2nd Question: Is there a sane way to queue an operation to be done in
>> > each specific CPU?
>> smp_call_function().

anton> The slab code was using smp_call_function until davem fixed it.

anton> On sparc blocking interrupts does not block the reception of cpu cross
anton> calls, so you cannot do anything like grab locks within a called function.

I have just dono a (2nd version of the patch). This version
uses smp_call_function, but don't grab any lock inside. I
sent the version to the list. It is also at:

Could you test if it is now safe in SMP Sparc also???? (/me has no
SMP Sparc's around nor knoledge about them :(

Later, Juan.

In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.079 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site