[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PIDs limited to 15 significant bits
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 08:35:28AM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:

> 31- or 32-bit PIDs might be a convenience, but they don't furnish
> security against wraparound attacks, they just make them take
> a little longer to exploit.

Precisely. It takes a factor 60000 longer.

Maybe you think security is a yes/no matter, but then no secure
systems exist. In real life it is a matter of less or more secure.

> vulnerabilities due to PID wrap should just plain get fixed

Yes. Just like all vulnerabilities.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.072 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site