Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 30 Sep 2000 18:06:02 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) |
| |
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> ie should we say that ALL distros have to ship with, and be compatible with the > standard kernel? If a distro has a patch that they want in the kernel, and the > mainstream kernel doesn't feel it belongs, should it be labeled differently? > Do we go with a Debian Linux, Redhat Linux, etc.. accepting that they are all > different, but from a common heritage Why not? Worked for BSD just fine.
> or should there be a 'seal of approval' so that > a distro can indicate it is 100% linux mainstream, as in > SomeDistro Linux, '100% Linux Standard Compliant'
Yeah... And then we'll have every marketdroid and his mom _really_ trying hard to get every patch into the main tree. Thanks, but no thanks.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |