[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?)

On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote:

> ie should we say that ALL distros have to ship with, and be compatible with the
> standard kernel? If a distro has a patch that they want in the kernel, and the
> mainstream kernel doesn't feel it belongs, should it be labeled differently?
> Do we go with a Debian Linux, Redhat Linux, etc.. accepting that they are all
> different, but from a common heritage
Why not? Worked for BSD just fine.

> or should there be a 'seal of approval' so that
> a distro can indicate it is 100% linux mainstream, as in
> SomeDistro Linux, '100% Linux Standard Compliant'

Yeah... And then we'll have every marketdroid and his mom
_really_ trying hard to get every patch into the main tree. Thanks, but no

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.234 / U:2.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site