[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: zero-copy TCP

On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:

> You can already cause incorrect checksums on the wire just by passing
> a partly unmapped address (the zero-the-rest exception handler in
> csum_copy_generic in i386 forgets to add in the carry)
> I do not believe it is a big deal, packets with bad checksum are not
> really a problem (you can usually do other better DoS that do not need
> it)

i think it's a quality of implementation issue. The csum_copy_generic
thing is a bug. Allowing incorrect checksums to be sent out would be a
design bug. I think some RFCs do even forbid the sending of incorrect


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.138 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site