lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to know what it was. Last I heard, it was still the
> > > case of "pages just off the freelist had some bits set that they
> > > shouldn't have". That makes me nervous.
> >
> > Nope, that was what you /thought/ it was.
>
> Rik.
>
> You're apparently completely ignoring the fact that the page
> "already on the LRU queue" was just allocated from
> __alloc_pages() in the backtrace you had.

It wasn't. If it was allocated there, the boobytraps in
either rmqueue() or page_reclaim() would have caught it.

> It's not me "thinking" anything. That was what your backtrace
> said. And apparently it's still not clear _why_. So why are you
> arguing?

Because I've boobytrapped rmqueue() and page_reclaim() and
know that it isn't what it seemed like at first.

regards,

Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.117 / U:4.724 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site