[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.4.0-t9p7 and mmap002 - freeze
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> Another thing I'm curious about is increasing memory pressure in
> the event of an allocation failure (retry). Why do we do that?

We were short on free memory, so kswapd should work /harder/
to keep up with the current load.

> P.S. in buffer.c, we do a LockPage(), but no UnlockPage() in
> the case of no_buffer_head.. is that correct?

No it isn't ;) Thanks for pointing out this one...


"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:1.007 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site