[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux kernel modules development in C++
    ** Reply to message from Tigran Aivazian <> on Wed, 27 Sep
    2000 20:10:49 +0100 (BST)

    > at the bottom of each message there is a url to lkml FAQ - have you read
    > it? It should say (I haven't read it myself but it _should_, Richard you
    > hear this? :) plainly that Linux (or any UNIX) kernel development in C++
    > is a very bad idea and explain why. Because C++ is not yet a mature
    > programming language for tasks where precise knowledge of the generated
    > code is required (and probably will never be). Think of C programming (in
    > the kernel) simply as an assembly programming but using compiler as a
    > useful shortcut generator, instead of typing tedious (and most
    > importantly, arch-dependent!) sequences of instructions. Just a way to
    > save time, and still remain in total control of what the resulting code
    > will do and precisely how it will do it.

    Why is that important? Sure, the kernel itself may need that level of control,
    but 90% of device drivers don't! As long as you have a decent C++ compiler
    (one that creates clean code, like Watcom's does), and you don't try to use
    esoteric features like exception handling, it should work just fine.

    Timur Tabi -
    Interactive Silicon -

    When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just get two copies of the same message.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.019 / U:14.944 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site