lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: the new VMt
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 11:45:02AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
[snip]
> "Overcommit" to me is the same things as Mark Hemment stated earlier in this
> thread -- the "fact that the system has over committed its memory resources.
> ie. it has sold too many tickets for the number of seats in the plane, and all
> the passengers have turned up." Basically any case where too many tickets
> have been sold (applied to the entire system, and all subsystems).
[snip]
> If the Beancounter patch lets the kernel count "passengers", classify them
> (with user hinting) so the pilot and flight attendants (init, X, or whatever)
> always stay on the plane, and has some sane predictable mechanism for booting
> non-priveledged passengers, then I am all for it.

That's exactly what I'm doing.

> How does one provide the kernel with hints as to which processes are sacred?
> Where does one find this beancounter patch? How much weight does it add to
> the kernel?

ftp://ftp.sw.com.sg/pub/Linux/people/saw/kernel/user_beancounter/UserBeancounter.html

The current version has some drawbacks, and one of them is the performance.
Memory accounting is implemented as a kernel thread which goes through page
tables of processes (similar to kswapd), and it appears to consume 1-5% of
CPU (depending on number of processes). I consider it unacceptable, and have
started reimplementation of the process memory accounting from the beginning.

Best regards
Andrey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.289 / U:5.900 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site