Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:08:46 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: the new VM |
| |
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:42:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > such screwups by checking for NULL and trying to handle it. I suggest to > rather fix those screwups.
How do you know which is the minimal amount of RAM that allows you not to be in the screwedup state?
We for sure need a kind of counter for the special dynamic structures but I'm not sure if that should account the static stuff as well.
Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |