[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: AW: Given an image, how can show its config?
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote:

> James Sutherland wrote:
> > No. I am assuming you are installing the kernel on the machine you do
> > "make modules_install" on. Obviously it is possible to install a different
> > kernel image of the same version without updating the modules - but if you
> > do so, expect nasty things to happen anyway if you're using modules!
> I normally compile on one machine and distribute it. This isn't a viable
> solution.

Unless you omit the modules directory, that's not a problem.

> > In more complex cases, find a more complex solution - this is a nice
> > simple solution which works for the typical case of building and
> > installing a kernel!
> >
> > If you are DIY upgrading a box's kernel, this solution works fine. If
> > you're maintaining a distribution, you should be able to use this solution
> > without much extra effort. If you are building kernels to DIY upgrade
> > other machines, and don't bother copying /lib/modules/`uname -r` then you
> > need to find another solution. I doubt this scenario is common enough to
> > justify denying the vast majority of Linux users this facility!
> Linus tends to go for the 'perfect' solution, not the 'almost' solution. I
> fully agree. uname -r simply doesn't have the granularity necessary.

It's worked perfectly well so far.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.061 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site