Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:28:01 -0300 (BRT) | From | Marcelo Tosatti <> | Subject | Re: more testing on 2.4.0-t9p[456] VM deadlocks |
| |
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > well, the __GFP_IO part is included (in a different way). The slab.c part > > > is not included. > > > > Actually the __GFP_IO check is now only inside ext2. > > no, it isnt. It's in the VFS. In fact the __GFP_IO check has not changed > semantically, it just got moved further down.
True, my mistake.
As far as I understood, you want to remove this check for 2.4 when all filesystems do not possibly reach shrink_{i,d}cache_memory while holding the superblock lock.
If so, which filesystems still needs fixing that you know (except ext2) ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |